An excerpt from The Road to Freedom by Arthur C. Brooks.
WHAT IS FREE ENTERPRISE? It is the system of values and laws
that respects private property and limits government, encourages competition
and industry, celebrates achievement based on merit, and creates individual
opportunity. Under free enterprise, people can pursue their own ends, and they
reap the rewards and consequences, positive and negative, of their own actions.
7 Free enterprise requires trust in markets to produce the most desirable
outcomes for society.
The opposite of free enterprise is statism, which is the belief
that the government is generally the best, fairest, and most trustworthy entity
to distribute resources and coordinate our economic lives.
(A
system and theory that has been proven absolutely incorrect time after time in
dozens of nations over the last 200 years).
At first glance, moving America back toward free enterprise
should be simple. Two years ago, Arthur Brooks published a book showing that
about 70 percent of Americans say they love free enterprise. They favor it over
all other alternatives and are proud of the fact that the nation is based on
this ideal. Large majorities say they want less government than we currently
have. 8 (Arthur Brooks, The Battle: How the Fight Between Free
Enterprise and Big Government Will Shape America’s Future; Basic Books, 2010).
But if that’s true, why is the government today so bloated,
so powerful, and so imperious? Why do Americans acquiesce to almost every
expansion of government—beyond the boundaries of what the Founders intended,
and beyond what they say they actually want? For example, the Obama
administration’s health-care reforms are unpopular with a majority of citizens,
yet in a poll fielded by CBS News/New York Times in 2010, 64 percent of people
said they thought that government should provide health insurance for everyone.
9
This is a paradox, but not a mystery. On the one hand,
citizens say they love free enterprise. On the other hand, they sure wouldn’t
mind a new government-funded rec center and maybe a few free prescription
drugs, and politicians gladly oblige to win votes. Most people hardly have the
time to consider the inconsistency between these things.
In America, the road to serfdom doesn’t come from a knock in
the night and a jackbooted thug. It comes from making one little compromise to
the free enterprise system after another. Each sounds sort of appealing. No
single one is enough to bring down the system. But add them all up, and here we
are: 81 percent of our citizen's dissatisfied.
So what’s the solution? How do we help Americans understand
that unless they actively choose free enterprise and eschew big government,
they will ultimately only get the latter? Some say Americans need to hear a
more forceful argument than ever before about the economic superiority of free
enterprise over the alternatives. In other words, capitalism’s advocates need
to yell louder that free enterprise makes us richer than statism. Master the
numbers, make some charts, and show Americans the evidence. Arthur C. Brooks,
President of American Enterprise Institute
says he wishes that strategy were correct. “Nothing would make my job easier”,
says Arthur Brooks. But that strategy isn’t correct. Materialistic arguments
for free enterprise have been tried again and again. They have failed to stem
the tide of big government. There’s only one kind of argument that will shake
people awake: a moral one. Free enterprise advocates need to build the moral
case to remind Americans why the future of the nation is worth more to each of
us than a few short-term government benefits. To get off the path to social
democracy or long-term austerity, all of us who love freedom must be able to
express what is written on our hearts about what our Founders struggled to give
us, what the culture of free enterprise has brought to our lives, and about the
opportunity society we want to leave our children.
A LOT OF PEOPLE are reluctant to talk about morals or make a
moral case for anything in politics and policy. We’re willing to talk about
principles, perhaps. Values, maybe. But morals? Especially among conservatives,
morality evokes unpleasant memories of the “culture wars” of the 1990s, which
focused on schismatic issues like abortion and homosexuality. As a result, many
who believe in free enterprise steer clear of all public moral arguments. This
is a mistake and a missed opportunity. A great deal of research shows that
people from all walks of life demand a system that is morally legitimate, not
just efficient. 10 The moral legitimacy of free enterprise depends
largely on how the system enables people to flourish, whether the system is
fair, and how the system treats the least fortunate in society. Privately, free
enterprise’s champions talk about these things incessantly. While they
generally believe in the need for a safety net, they celebrate capitalism
because they believe that succeeding on merit, doing something meaningful,
seeing the poor rise by their hard work and virtue, and having control over
life are essential to happiness and fulfillment. But in public debate, they
often fall back on capitalism’s superiority to other systems just in terms of
productivity and economic efficiency.
What moves them is the story of their
immigrant grandparents who came to America to be free; but what they talk about
is the most efficacious way to achieve a balanced budget. The dogged reliance
on materialistic arguments is a gift to statists. It allows them to paint free
enterprise advocates as selfish and motivated only by money. Those who would
expand the government have successfully appropriated the language of morality
for their own political ends; redistributionist policies, they have claimed to
great effect, are fairer, kinder, and more virtuous. 11 Too frequently,
the rejoinder to these moral claims has been either dumbfounded silence or even
more data on economic growth and fiscal consolidation. Average Americans are
thus too often left with two lousy choices in the current policy debates: the
moral left versus the materialistic right. The public hears a heartfelt
redistributionist argument from the left that leads to the type of failed
public policies all around us today. But sometimes it feels as if the alternative
comes from morally bereft conservatives who were raised by wolves and don’t
understand basic moral principles. No wonder the general public is paralyzed
into inaction, even when dissatisfaction with government is at an all-time
high. There just doesn’t seem to be a good alternative to the “statist quo,”
and as a consequence, the country is slipping toward a system that few people
actually like.
AMERICANS HAVE actually forgot what the Founders knew well.
They understood the need to make the moral argument for freedom, and they were
not afraid to do so. In fact, they put a moral promise front and center in the
Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident,
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with
certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
of Happiness. 12
I contend that the American Free Enterprise System – a system
that has existed since our nation’s founding; is precisely the ideal vehicle
for our citizens to continue and achieve ‘The Pursuit of Happiness’!
More to come.
Sources / Resources
Brooks, Arthur C. (2012-05-08). The Road to Freedom: How to
Win the Fight for Free Enterprise.
7 See Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic
Capitalism (Madison Books, 1991); and Charles Murray, “The Happiness of the People,”
Irving Kristol Lecture, American Enterprise Institute, 2009.
8 Arthur Brooks, The Battle: How the Fight Between
Free Enterprise and Big Government Will Shape America’s Future (Basic Books,
2010).
9 Joel Roberts, “Poll: The Politics of Healthcare,”
CBS News/New York Times, June 14, 2010, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/01/opinion/polls/main2528357.shtml
According to a 2011 CBS news poll 51 percent of Americans said that they
disapproved of the healthcare law, versus 35 percent who approved of it. See http://www.american.com/archive/datapoint-entries/healthcare-update
10 Jonathan Haidt, “The New Synthesis in Moral
Psychology,” Science 316, no. 5827 (May 18, 2007): 998–1002.
11 George Lakoff, Don’t Think of an Elephant!
(Chelsea Green Publishing, 2004). Another reason why statists win the moral
debates about our system is that they have figured out better than the right
how to “frame” the arguments. The master of political argument framing is
George Lakoff, a linguist at the University of California, Berkeley. In his 2004
bestseller Don’t Think of an Elephant!, Lakoff argues that when it comes to
successful politics, those who control the moral language get to frame the
debate and win the hearts of voters. In progressive framing, free enterprise
advocates are rigid and selfish, and their inability to make a strong moral
case for freedom has only reinforced this view.
12 Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.
No comments:
Post a Comment